Rabbi Judah ha-Nasi (latter half of the second and beginning of the third century C.E.), considered to be the redactor of the Codification of basic Jewish Oral Law; edited and arranged by R. Judah ha-Nasi c. 200 C.E. Mishnah , made a statement that started a trend of legal development resulting in the elimination of the category of normal menstruation and its replacement by the category of abnormal bleeding, ziva. His statement reflects the possible confusion in keeping track of one’s period, especially in light of the new system of pithei niddah. If this was done intentionally, the couple incurred the punishment of karet; if done unintentionally, they were obligated to bring a sin offering. Atonement by sacrifice, however, could not be made after the destruction of the Temple in the year 70 C.E. Great efforts were therefore made to prevent inadvertent sins of this nature. Joseph citing Rav Judah who had it from Rav stated: Rabbi ordained at Sadot: If a woman observed a discharge on one day she must wait six days in addition to it. If she observed discharges on two days she must wait six days in addition to these. If she observed a discharge on three days she must wait seven clean days.”

After he stood in order to hope

It declaration by Rabbi Judah ha-Nasi generally eliminated the menstruating females from the normal monthly period classification and you may placed them on the unpredictable condition regarding zava since most normal attacks history at the least three days. Apparently his concern was you to given the complex clarifications must choose whenever one is niddah of course, if it’s possible to end up being a good zava, one to you are going to arrived at go awry that have grievous consequences. First the fresh decree got limited impact; it appears to be having come regional, and will was restricted to situations where doubt try with it while the regional population wasn’t sufficiently discovered to decide into the such as facts ( Rabbi Solomon ben Isaac; b. Troyes, France, 1040 Rashi ). Yes it was not a standard decree for everybody out-of Israel, nonetheless it is actually the first step because recommendations. In the 1st one or two instances, Rabbi’s report deals with a lady which can be a zava or possibly a niddah. The woman is addressed in the 1st case since the a niddah, having an excellent 7-day age of impurity, in the place of 1 day from impurity throughout the day out-of hemorrhaging, the laws to have a minor zava. Throughout the next example this woman is managed while the a great niddah and you can a zava whether your first-day got when you look at the their ziva months (the newest 11 days ranging from menstrual periods). In the 3rd disease, this woman is treated due to the fact a complete zava. Every three rulings make the significantly more strict condition.

BT Niddah 66a gives us Rabbi’s report: “Roentgen

Subsequent statements by other sages make it absolutely certain that it was understood to be a general ent are from the amoraim, the sages who created the Palestinian and Babylonian Talmudim. Amoraim could not dispute tannaitic rulings without tannaitic support but they created fences around the Torah to prevent inadvertent sins. We find a aic) “spokesman.” Scholars active during the period from the completion of the Mishnah (c. 200 C.E.) until the completion of the Jerusalem and Babylonian Talmuds (end of the fourth and fifth centuries respectively), who were active primarily in the interpretation of the Mishnah. In the chain of tradition they follow the tanna’im and precede the savora’im. amora Rav Huna in JT Berakhot (5:1, 8d): “Rav Huna said: One who sees a drop of blood like [the size of a] mustard seed sits https://datingmentor.org/escort/paterson/ and keeps [because of it] seven clean days. ” The statement was made as an example of an undisputed law from which one could then turn to prayer. Such a law would clear one’s mind because there were no arguments about it, thereby allowing one to focus totally on prayer. Rav Huna’s statement is much more radical than the tannaitic version quoted above. According to him, all women who see uterine blood are in the category of the complete zava, regardless of the size of the blood stain and despite the normalcy of menstruation or having seen such blood only one or two days.